Monday 18 November 2013

Tendulkar's perfect balance

In a wide-ranging, insightful speech at the Pataudi Memorial Lecture the day before the India v West Indies Mumbai Test, Anil Kumble said Sachin Tendulkar had been, "all things to all men".
To the cricketing world, Tendulkar was a batsman for the ages. In 2010, when he made the ESPNcricinfo all-time World XI, Tendulkar said, "It would have been great to walk out with Don Bradman" and to talk to Hobbs and Hutton "about what it was like to play on uncovered wickets".
They would no doubt have a few questions for him too; about the creative dexterity of his strokeplay, the weight of his bat, the data-analysis business, and how on earth he handled the attention. This modern wire-walker with over three generations of team-mates, straddling two millennia and two formats, would have tried to explain how classical fundamentals could always fashion a contemporary response to an ever-changing game.
Balance, they would all nod in agreement, it's all about balance.
To Indians, young and old, inside and outside the geographical boundaries of the nation, Tendulkar offered a new vocabulary to India's batting template and did so with an old-fashioned Indianness that has never left him. When first sighted, his batting went against the grain; it was like crazy street-racing - top-down, foot-on-floor, high volume. The spectators shrieked, but importantly, Tendulkar didn't. He heard their chanting but it didn't make his head spin.
In his speech, Kumble, a team-mate, a friend, and his ultimate go-to man, also pointed out that the "median age of the country is roughly the number of years Sachin has been playing first-class cricket". He was referring to the average age of the Indian population, which is just over 26.
Tendulkar grew to stature at a time when India was an untrendy corner of the planet, its "markets" not yet sought after by global corporations. In an environment of almost reflexive national self-doubt, he stuck the tricolour on to his helmet and went out to bat, destroying bowling attacks in his first decade in the game even as the rest of the team floundered around him. This whirligig of image, memory and possibility turned Tendulkar into a Pied Piper figure for Indian cricket. One generation after another followed him, gathering around "open skies" TV screens, or being pulled into grounds whenever the team travelled. It is they who started the chant that never stopped.
A career of adulation and a lamentation upon his retirement was to be expected amongst hardcore Tendulkar fans. On his final day in the game, like the Creed song, Tendulkar laid out a lifetime of gratitude. "With arms wide open / under the sunlight / welcome to this place / I'll show you everything."

Sachin Tendulkar Official Infomation

Sachin Tendulkar      

 
 
 
 
 
 
Full name Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar
Born April 24, 1973, Bombay (now Mumbai), Maharashtra
Current age 40 years 209 days
Major teams India, Asia XI, Mumbai, Mumbai Indians, Yorkshire
Nickname Tendlya, Little Master
Playing role Top-order batsman
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style Right-arm offbreak, Legbreak googly
Height 5 ft 5 in
Education Sharadashram Vidyamandir School
In a nutshell Perhaps the most complete batsman and the most worshipped cricketer in the world, Tendulkar holds just about every batting record worth owning in the game, including those for most runs and hundreds in Tests and ODIs, and most international runs. More
Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar
Batting and fielding averages

Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78

51 68
69 115 0
ODIs 463 452 41 18426 200* 44.83 21367 86.23 49 96 2016 195 140 0
T20Is 1 1 0 10 10 10.00 12 83.33 0 0 2 0 1 0
First-class 310 490 51 25396 248* 57.84

81 116

186 0
List A 551 538 55 21999 200* 45.54

60 114

175 0
Twenty20 96 96 11 2797 100* 32.90 2310 121.08 1 16 359 38 28 0
Bowling averages

Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
Tests 200 145 4240 2492 46 3/10 3/14 54.17 3.52 92.1 0 0 0
ODIs 463 270 8054 6850 154 5/32 5/32 44.48 5.10 52.2 4 2 0
T20Is 1 1 15 12 1 1/12 1/12 12.00 4.80 15.0 0 0 0
First-class 310
7605 4384 71 3/10
61.74 3.45 107.1
0 0
List A 551
10230 8478 201 5/32 5/32 42.17 4.97 50.8 4 2 0
Twenty20 96 8 93 123 2 1/12 1/12 61.50 7.93 46.5 0 0
 
 

His last dress rehearsal

Exactly at 0954 hours Wednesday morning Sachin Tendulkar walks down the steps from the Indian dressing room at the Wankhede Stadium. Sudhir Gautam, the man who has created his own niche as Tendulkar's most popular fan, blows the conch shell while waving the Indian tri-colour, from the adjacent MCA Pavilion. At the same time a local train chugs out of the Churchgate station. A journey has started for many. For Tendulkar it will be his final nets before he walks in tomorrow to play one last time.
With his pads tugged under his shoulders along with his hip and elbow guards and helmet, Tendulkar carries two bats with one hand and an unbranded bat in the other. The shutterbugs fire away, making a noise like the flapping wings of pigeons taking off for a flight.
An hour after entering the ground Tendulkar, finally enters the nets where he can breathe easy finally. He has already obliged the maalis while sitting with them for a group picture as well as giving a special thanks to the pair of Lalsuram Jaiswal and Vijay Tambe, the oldest groundsmen at Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA). When Jaiswal wanted an exclusive picture with Tendulkar, the player jokingly said: "Make-up kar ke aaya hain kya (did you wear make-up and come?)," eliciting a loud laughter all round. A short while later N Srinivsan, the BCCI president, had a short chat with Tendulkar.
It is amazing that Tendulkar for decades has never let the outside elements distract his game. So as soon as he joins the rest of the squad, his eyes are on the ball. On a bent knee as he put his pads on Tendulkar continues his diligent watch across the nets watching the Indian top order bat.
He swivels his neck first left, then right and then all around before putting on the helmet. Rubbing his palms and swinging his hangs he tries to release the stress as he waits for his turn to bat. Two bats, both branded rest on a chair while the third lies flat on the ground. On Tuesday, Tendulkar, on his way to taking throwdowns, had by mistake stepped on one of the bats. Immediately he bowed and lowered one hand towards the bat and then towards his head. Usually Indians do that gesture if they mistakenly step on the toes of another person. For Tendulkar, his bat is a sacred weapon and he dare not step on it.
As soon as he has marked his guard he asks the bowling coach Joe Dawes to describe the field. The first ball, from a net bowler, pitching on off stump and moving away, is left alone. For the next 10 minutes Tendulkar plays the trio of Mohammed Shami, Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Ishant Sharma and two net bowlers with confidence and ease. When Shami bowled an inswinger, he left it again. The bowler enquires if the ball has come in. Tendulkar tells him to focus on keeping his wrist upright.
As those early nerves disappear and Tendulkar is picking length easily, you can see he is playing strokes with certainty. One of his best shots of the morning comes when he moves quickly on the back foot, rises on his toes to punch a handsome square drive - a certain four in the match.
To watch Tendulkar from a close space is not just a privilege but can also leave you with a spine-tingling sensation most times. There is no better sight than watching Tendulkar prepare to face a ball. He will mark his crease by dragging his toe a few times across the batting crease. Even before he pats his bat down, he will flex his knees up and down like a coil of spring. Then he will pat his bat down between two or three times with his bottom-handed grip. His stance has always been side-on as he stands still with an erect posture: shoulders, left elbow, hips and knees all in a straight line. His head does not move. There is no trigger movement. Cricket pundits talk about balance and it becomes clear if you are near Tendulkar in nets.
That sequence has barely changed in decades. Perhaps it is a habit that Tendulkar needs to make himself feel relaxed and confident. In the second net he faces the spin pair of Pragyan Ojha and Amit Mishra. Today he is not facing the offspin of R Ashwin as he had done that on Tuesday. Yesterday Tendulkar had come in with a pre-determined plan. He wanted to practice the sweep shot and he focused on that. Today it is all about reaching to the pitch of the ball and defending.
So when Ojha manages to dip a ball on the off stump and it is about spin into him, Tendulkar nips the turn in the bud decisively by stretching fully on his left leg to defend while his right foot is rooted to the crease. Although Tendulkar is bowled by Mishra attempting a slog sweep, the batsman is back in ascendance as he lofts the legspinner for a one-bounce straight four and over the covers to show who is in command.
People who have worked with Tendulkar in the nets point out Tendulkar's sole intention to make sure he has ticked all the boxes primarily. But the most important thing is the feel. And to understand that feel, you need to be around. Because when Tendulkar plays a forward defense and you see his left elbow straight, his head bowing like a Japanese saying hello to the ball and the toes pointing towards cover you know as much as him that it is textbook perfect. It is just not his perfection that stands out. It is the ease with which he manages to impart that technique that increases the awe.
As Anil Kumble, Tendulkar's former team-mate and former captain, reminded us during the MAK Pataudi Memorial lecture, that fans tend to forget the thousands of hours of hardwork Tendulkar has put in to play strokes so clean, so elegant, so timeless, so memorable. In the end it is in the nets where Tendulkar started his dream.

Why do we insist on seeing the 'real' Sachin?

Which is your favourite Sachin? The child who scooter-pillioned from maidan to maidan, playing three matches a day? The boy who stood on a deck set on fire by Waqar and Imran? The son of India who Lata Mangeshkar kisses on the forehead?
My favourite Sachin is the boy who scampers after the ball with the enthusiasm and delight of a cricketer playing his first inter-school match. The delight, the glee at having an open field to run in, a ball to chase, a day to spend under a cloudless sky - that, I believe, is the essence of Sachin.
We all have our favourite, and it is of that favourite we ask: is this the real Sachin? Perhaps one way of finding out is by imagining Tendulkar having played a different sport and then asking ourselves: Would anything change? Would he be different? What if he was a tennis player? What if he had been a tennis contemporary of one of his childhood heroes, John McEnroe?
Imagine McEnroe playing Sachin in a tennis match. John spewing and cursing, Tendulkar stoic, determined, aggressive. John thinking he'd steamroll this meek Indian kid through sheer intimidation, only to find Sachin, after a quick adjustment of his shorts, rifling forehand after forehand past him. (Would he play left- or right-handed?) Would Sachin ever exhort himself with a Murrayesque "Come on!" on breaking McEnroe after being a set down? Would he change his shirt to catcalls in the break? Pump his fists and thrust his crotch in a Becker hip-stutter on taking the fourth set to make it two-all? Would he collapse on his back, crying, when won 9-7 in the fifth? Throw his wrist bands and towels into the stands? What would his exultation be like when he lifted the cup at Wimbledon? Would he have, a few minutes before, clambered up clumsily to hug his trainer, his girlfriend, his mother? Or would he simply play controlled, aggressive tennis, emotions in check, VIP gallery unmolested, trophy kissed for the cameras, autographs for the ball boys, a ball or two hit high into the stands?
Would playing another sport have revealed the "real" Sachin to us? For the answer, we have to turn our gaze inwards.
Towards us. To our insolent impatience, our speed of dismissiveness, our propensity to fawn, our alacrity to scorn, our delusion in claiming greatness through our idols. Would you risk showing any more emotion than Tendulkar has if you were faced with the most volatile, excitable, mercurial crowd on earth? Would you risk being skinned one day and crowned the next? What would that do to your equilibrium, your focus, your sanity? And what if this extended into every corner, every millisecond of your private life? Would you air your opinions freely knowing they could start a riot? Take a stand knowing people might immolate themselves?

Would you risk showing any more emotion than Tendulkar has if you were faced with the most volatile, excitable, mercurial crowd on earth?
And so, when you retired would you change because you feel the pressure lift? Or, having descended one step below the pedestal, would the protective gild of idolatry lose one coat, making you 10% more vulnerable and open to the sharks? Would you breathe easier because you don't have to step into a cauldron of 50,000 people every week, or would it be suffocating to not ever play under a summer sky bleached by an Indian sun?
It was easier for McEnroe when he retired. Much easier. All he had to do was sober down. He gentled down. He relaxed, and so did we. It was a relief. Now, just to keep us interested he plays the odd exhibition match where he stokes the "You cannot be serious!" myth by giving us theatrical displays of mock anger.
With Sachin the question is different: do we really want to see him with his guard down? Because then there might have existed the possibility he would not have quite commanded the unquestioning respect of a young-blood Indian dressing room despite his records, his incredible cricket brain, his intense desire to maximise everybody's abilities. He mightn't have been listened to as intently as he sorted out technical glitches in tens of India debutantes, batsmen and bowlers. Captain after captain might have quietly and ever so slightly discounted his counsel to change the field, shuffle the batting order, effect a risky bowling change. Because he would not have had the aura. The halo.
You can ask as much as you want for a more "human", more "feelable, touchable" Sachin. But it's my bet he's never going to change. He's going to be the Sachin we've always known - considerate, gentle, fiercely determined, careful, kind, well brought up.
Lightning rods of a country's hopes and dreams don't have options, they have responsibilities. Thank your stars he never forgets that.

A special ability to stay in the moment

Sachin Tendulkar completed the most incredible, wonderful 24 years imaginable. While the records stand out, it is the humility and inspiration that will last forever.
It will be his temperament that I will remember the most. When he batted against New Zealand at the tender age of 16 in the first Test in Christchurch in early 1990, he lasted just one ball, caught behind off Danny Morrison. The ball was too quick and too tough for this young boy.
A week later, on a slightly slower pitch in Napier, he found his feet and the pace of the bowling and went on to play a beautiful innings of 88. He fell just short of becoming the youngest Test centurion of all time. What astonished me at close quarters was his ability to forget the nerves and pain of the previous week, and to instead focus on what was in front of him.
He batted with a freedom from expectation and simply embraced the moment and his joy and love for the game. He moved easily, stroking the ball late and with power, playing each ball on its merits. As the century came closer, for the first time in the innings, he felt the sense of occasion, and not the sense of the next ball. He got out playing loosely, throwing his hands at the ball early, a sure sign his mind was getting ahead of himself. I have no doubt he would have learned one of his most invaluable lessons from that dismissal. From that moment on he would have learnt to stay in the moment no matter what the score, no matter what milestone approached.
The only other time I have seen his temperament falter, as it did as a 16-year-old in Napier, was when he went through that agonisingly long period of trying to register his 100th international hundred. That period seemed to last an eternity. It was simply too much of a burden mentally for him to knock that miraculous milestone off, as he had done the previous 99 hundreds. So in many ways getting his first hundred, and then his last, were indeed the hardest.
That he never got another hundred after the hundredth tells the story of a man who had climbed his Mt Everest, with nothing more to be achieved. In the end he went back to being the greatest example of humility and inspiration, as he spent the last three years simply playing for the love of the game and the love of his people.
It was the perfect end in Mumbai. If he had scored another hundred it would have conjured up more desire within, to keep going. By faltering and falling on 74 he proved to himself that the time was perfect.
Sachin, you graced those 22 yards in a way that no other man or woman has ever done. You graced the game of cricket on a level that has never been matched. From WG Grace to now, you stand above them all.

Tendulkar: devoid of malice

A complete absence of malice. Hard to say about anyone in modern sport these days. From fans to commentators to fierce opponents and team-mates. Who can I think of in contemporary male sport, a genuine world champion on a truly global scale, who is devoid of malice, either directed at him by others or from within?
I qualify it by gender because generally speaking, female sport is much kinder, much less vicious, dare I say it, more mature, about the way it perceives champions, either from the outside looking in or through the lens of the champion herself, excelling without feeling the need to "fire up" in the way that many male athletes are conditioned to do in order to reach the very pinnacle. That so-called "mongrel" that is apparently necessary to lift performance from the mediocre to the magical. Female sport often rids itself of this unnecessary burden. ennis has a few such men, it seems. To an outsider anyway. Roger Federer, Pete Sampras and Rafael Nadal appear to have scaled dizzy heights without inviting a malicious word from the industry. Perhaps the insiders know better, but if so, then it is a well-hidden secret to the rest of us. Mo Farah, the Olympic champion middle-distance runner from the UK, is another that springs to mind. Haven't heard a malicious word about him. In rugby, a sport that I am very closely associated with in my work as a life-skills coach, the All Blacks captain Richie McCaw ascends those heights, albeit tainted slightly by those who think his playing style skirts the borders of the rules, but that's almost accepted as part of the territory when it comes to a No. 7 in rugby. Within the industry, I haven't heard a bad word said about McCaw, even from bitter opponents. An absence of malice. A special tag indeed.
More than any other cricketer, living or dead, Sachin Tendulkar is the one true giant of the game who still gives me that impression, in his demeanour towards others and going by incoming fire. An absence of malice.
Again, perhaps those in the inner sanctum might have other tales to tell, but the mere fact that none have emerged, despite a 24-year career, almost all of it at rarefied altitude, is testament to the fact that anyone with a malicious story to tell hasn't had the guts to say it, or the audience been prepared to listen. All the records with bat aside, Sachin's reputation as a person sets him apart from any other cricketing great.
We're only talking a select few here in terms of that sort of company. We're talking WG Grace, the Don, Len Hutton, Garry Sobers, Dennis Lillee, Viv Richards, Shane Warne, Ian Botham, Muttiah Muralitharan, Glenn McGrath and Brian Lara perhaps. Even that list is bound to be disputed by readers. Fair enough too - it is but an opinion that is coloured by my own memories and prejudices.
I think Jacques Kallis deserves to be mentioned in this list, such is my respect for his phenomenal record over a long period. When he retires, he deserves the sort of accolades that Tendulkar has received. If he had been a Springbok instead of a Protea, he would no doubt be immortalised in South Africa. But of these players listed above, who among them can we truly say is without malice, from any quarter, incoming or outgoing? I'd be tempted to put Murali and Lara in that bracket, but as much as I like them, they have both courted controversy at various times in their careers, sometimes not of their own making but attracting malice nonetheless. It's not a question of fault but of trying to find the cricketer in whose case there has been an absence of malice.

It speaks to the humility of a man like Gavaskar, an absolute god in Indian cricket circles, that he has enough room in his heart (and ego) to share that space with another deity
Of Sachin's contemporaries in the Indian dressing room, I would nominate Rahul Dravid and Anil Kumble as being worthy of a mention in this category. Dravid I have never met, so my impression of him is only from what I've heard from knowledgeable folk within the camp. Not even a single word to suggest malice. Kumble, on the other hand, is someone that I've had personal experience of.
Without going into too much detail, I had an encounter with him in 1998 at Sir John Paul Getty's beautiful cricket ground in Buckinghamshire (he was playing for JPG's XI and I was representing MCC) and Kumble showed me an act of kindness and humility that will live with me forever. I cannot imagine anyone having a malicious thought about this man, despite his strong opinions, as evidenced by his inspirational and brave speech last week at the Pataudi Memorial Lecture. But in terms of those half-dozen cricketers who we will remember in 500 years' time, neither of these two fine gentlemen may make that list.
I've asked many people close to the international cricket circuit and within the Indian set-up if the Tendulkar image is a carefully constructed bubble that will one day be pricked, but there is no hesitation when they emphatically shake their heads. With this article in mind, I listened intently to the commentators in his last Test, to see if I could pick up even the slightest hint of malice or jealousy and I heard nothing. Nothing.
Dravid, content in his own skin, had nothing but admiration for his old mate. Lara, the closest thing to a competitor that Tendulkar had during his reign (along with Ricky Ponting), was soft-spoken as usual, and he spoke with no hint of rancour. Ravi Shastri, who could have been forgiven for still thinking of Tendulkar as a young pup, was genuinely in awe of his reputation. Wasim Akram recounted fearsome battles but with almost a fatherly affection for the man who must have been Public Enemy No. 1 to any Pakistani cricketer. Warne v Tendulkar was often billed as the greatest battle in world cricket but you'd never know it, listening to Warne's grace and humility when it came to Tendulkar's legacy.
Whenever Sunil Gavaskar was on air, I listened with even more interest. Here was a man who might have had the most to gain from debunking the Tendulkar legend, even if it is impossible to do so on the basis of on-field records. Yet Gavaskar, having endured the might of the fearsome West Indian pace battery and with a batting record to die for, has no malice in his heart for the "Little Master", as he so fondly refers to him.
It speaks to the humility of a man like Gavaskar, an absolute god in Indian cricket circles, that he has enough room in his heart (and ego) to share that space with another deity.
Commentators are one thing - they are paid to be cautious on air. They sense the mood of the audience. What about opponents? Who is prepared to come out and tell us that SRT was a prickly opponent, a nasty man who was full of niggle and venom? I've heard nothing. That is an amazing thing when you consider how easy it must have been to hate the man who so often stood between you and victory. Someone who often hogged the limelight, even when he failed with the bat. Jealousy can provoke vicious reactions but even here, we hear a deafening silence.
Umpires? Anyone prepared to tell us that Sachin was a foul-tempered goon who never accepted a poor decision without kicking up an almighty stink? Lord knows he copped some absolute shockers (who wouldn't in such a long career?), but I marvelled at his unbelievable self-control during moments when it would have been easy to be swept up in the reaction of the crowds. There were times when he was aghast with a decision, but a split-second later, he tucked his bat under his arm and walked off, reputation intact. Grace under fire.
What about the invisible men and women, whose stories are sometimes even more telling because of their relative anonymity? What of those team managers, coach drivers, dressing-room attendants, hotel workers and other support staff? Again, a revealing lack of scandal or rumour.
I read today of the fact that in 24 years, Tendulkar has never been fined for being late to a meeting or for wearing the wrong uniform. Is that because he has never broken those rules or because no one was ever brave enough to fine him? I suspect the former - it just fits with everything else that people say about his respect for the game and his place in it, mindful always that in the eyes of millions, he was cricket.
In the current game, trying to think of players for whom the "absence of malice" tag can be applied, friend and foe alike, I can only come up with a few names, some of them not (yet) worthy of the all-time-great tag. The point here is that it is not the sheer numbers alone that distinguish Sachin's reputation. It is the fact that he has maintained this reputation despite being the most visible brand ambassador for the sport - and not just in India.
Hashim Amla, Shiv Chanderpaul and Mike Hussey are my three contemporary nominees, but they are some way from roosting in the same branches as Tendulkar, the Don or Sobers. In a totally different context, George Bailey is one of those guys who will be fondly remembered for his character, but he will be the first to admit that he doesn't deserve mention in a cricketing context in this conversation.
No matter - an absence of malice is still something to be proud of. It's just that being able to have that said about you, after scaling impossible peaks, crossing international borders and being a human god to so many people, is something that only a precious few can ever lay claim to. And that's the great irony of it - it is a claim that Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar will never make himself. He doesn't need to. He just is. He was. Will always be. No justification required. A living example of a champion with an absence of malice.

Rohit Sharma Official information








Full name Rohit Gurunath Sharma
Born April 30, 1987, Bansod, Nagpur, Maharashtra
Current age 26 years 203 days
Major teams India, Deccan Chargers, India A, India Green, India Under-19s, Mumbai, Mumbai Cricket Association President's XI, Mumbai Indians, Mumbai Under-19s
Playing role Batsman
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style Right-arm offbreak

 Batting and fielding averages

Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Tests 2 2 1 288 177 288.00 428 67.28 2 0 34 4 3 0
ODIs 108 103 20 3049 209 36.73 3835 79.50 4 19 241 52 36 0
T20Is 36 29 10 539 79* 28.36 424 127.12 0 5 42 21 15 0
First-class 60 89 9 5090 309* 63.62

18 20

44 0
List A 175 166 27 5221 209 37.56

7 32

59 0
Twenty20 165 154 30 4023 109* 32.44 3083 130.48 2 26 331 171 72 0